UNCOMMON SENSE 4 © revised January 2023
By Helen Lachs Ginsburg, Economics, Emerita, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Bill Ayres, Co-Founder of WhyHunger, and June Zaccone, Economics, Emerita, Hofstra University
Unemployment figures are not always what they seem. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) regularly reports the nation’s monthly and annual “official” unemployment rate. In 2021, this official unemployment averaged 5.3 percent, representing 8.6 million people. But these numbers don’t tell the whole story.
The BLS report provides data on large groups that are not counted as unemployed. Among them are 4.9 million involuntary part-time workers who wanted but weren’t able to get full-time employment, as well as another 6.3 million people who wanted jobs but were not actively seeking work. Of that group, 1.8 million had searched for work during the previous year and were available to take a job immediately. The rest wanted work but had not looked for it because they didn’t expect to find any, or weren’t able to work for a variety of reasons, including lack of child care or transportation, or a disability. Public policy changes, for example, affordable child care, would enable many of these people to work. In addition, in 2021, another 15.3 million people who worked full-time all year–one in eight full-time workers–had annual earnings below $27,740, the government’s meager poverty line for a family of four.
We need a new set of employment statistics that includes each of these four groups. Here is an example for 2021:
|Officially Unemployed Workers||8.6 Million|
|Involuntary Part-Time Workers||4.9 Million|
|Non-Job Seekers Who Want a Job||6.3 Million|
|Full-Time Year-Round Workers Earning less than Poverty Level* (for a family of four, 2021: $27,740)||15.3 Million [Estimate]|
**Source: estimated from Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement, Bur. of the Census, 2021) and Poverty thresholds Unemployment: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat01.htm
It should be noted that these numbers do not include our extraordinary jail and prison population. At the end of 2021, there were an estimated 1.2 million people in state and federal prison, despite a substantial drop.  That number grew rapidly in the 1980’s and 1990’s, peaking in 2008, made up disproportionately of young Black men. If inmates were counted as unemployed, the official jobless rate would rise by over one-half percentage point.
Even these adjusted unemployment data do not capture a full picture of the job market now. This would have to include the labor force participation rate [LFPR], the labor force as a share of the civilian noninstitutional population. For example, the rate that includes both men and women 16 years and older, reached a peak of 67.3% in early 2000. It recovered modestly, to 63.3% from Fall 2019 through early 2020 before plunging with covid. It is now only 62.3. [12/22] The rate for prime-age men [25 to 54 years old], 91.1% in January 2008, declined to 87.9% in April 2014 after the financial crisis of 2007-8, and was 89.4 in early 2020 before plunging with the virus [86.4%-4/20]. The latest shows some recovery to 88.5 [12/22]. 
The reported unemployment is an average rate. While the BLS reports the wide differences in the rate by sex, age, race, ethnicity, education, and region, these are not often given much attention. Some, such as race, disability or youth, are very significant. To illustrate, in December 2022, when overall unemployment was 3.5%, the black rate was 5.7%; for those with a disability, 5.0% [the lowest rate on record]; for teens, 10.4%; and for black teens, 17.1%. Current data are reported in our monthly unemployment report. Without the higher unemployment of the disabled that month, the unemployment rate would have been 3.2% instead of 3.5%.
Contrary to a widespread misperception that all of the unemployed collect unemployment insurance, in 2021, fewer than fewer than 40% did.  And on average, unemployment benefits replace less than half of an unemployed worker’s lost wages. (Official unemployment figures come from a sample survey of the population, not from unemployment insurance offices.)
After rising to nearly 15% during a month in 2020 during the epidemic, unemployment has finally fallen to levels below 4%. Though the Federal Reserve’s mandate is to reduce both unemployment and inflation, the latter has been privileged. Chronic fears of inflation of both the Fed and the financial sector have led to higher interest rates and dampened economic activity, often long before excess capacity and unemployment have been erased. Dallas Federal Reserve President Richard Fisher was already worrying about inflation as early as 2014, when unemployment was 6.1%. [7 and Uncommon Sense 3.] Note that asset inflation, like a booming stock market or rising home prices, gets only congratulation.
Corporate chiefs and financial elites fear that lower unemployment rates will increase worker power to get higher wages. However, far from wage increases, there has been a serious and unfair wage lag that has contributed to rising inequality: wage increases have fallen far short of productivity increases, benefiting corporate profits. The Economic Policy Institute has estimated that “productivity has grown 3.7 times as much as pay” between 1979 and 2021.  It was only in 2015 that real average hourly earnings maintained a level achieved by in 1976. In 2021, they had gained 10 percent above 1975, but average wages were less than the level of 2020.
After decades of lagging pay and benefits, job insecurity, long hours, and employer monitoring, workers have begun to resist. There is more public support for unions, and more worker action, such as organizing and strikes.  The change has resulted partly from worker reluctance to return to unsafe workplaces, and labor shortages with economic recovery, which have increased worker power to contest conditions of work.
Workers deserve a job guarantee mandating that everyone who wants a job has one and that all jobs pay at least a living wage. Congress (2019-2020) proposed a job guarantee—HR 1000—as does the movement underway to promote a federal job guarantee. Recognizing the burden of unemployment and low earnings borne by millions of Americans, we must develop policies which guarantee decent, living wage Jobs for All!
 “…if you add to it [official unemployment +discouraged+involuntary part-time] the millions of people that you have in jail in the U.S. — which is four times the amount of any civilized country as a share of population — than unemployment is probably closer to 20 percent. And that’s just among the average population. For minorities, the youth, or unskilled people that don’t have a high school degree, the number is closer to 30 percent.” Nouriel Roubini interview, Foreign Policy, 10/11. See also http://www.russellsage.org/blog/how-incarceration-data-affects-employment-figures and America has locked up so many black people it has warped our sense of reality, Guo, Wash. Post, 2/16
 “The participation rate is the share of the population 16 years and older working or seeking work.” https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=198255 BLS See “Is the Decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate During This Recession Permanent?”
 During recessions, more of the unemployed receive benefits as job losers are a larger fraction of the unemployed, but even with extended unemployment benefits and other special programs, most of the officially unemployed don’t receive benefits.
https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/Chartbook/a12.asp https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/images/carousel/application_and_recipiency.png https://www.dol.gov/ui/data.pdf https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/claims.asp
 That rate for 2021 was less than 45%. https://oui.doleta.gov/unemploy/ui_replacement_rates.asp
 “The debates over full employment and Federal Reserve policy are generally dominated by the interests of the minority who worry more about inflation and asset values than those who worry about jobs and paychecks.” Jared Bernstein,Wash. Post. See also Dallas Federal Reserve President Richard Fisher on Wages. “I would be very surprised if we were to simultaneously—as the Fed believes or the Fed forecasts—bring inflation down to something approaching the 2% range and, at the same time, see unemployment rise no higher than 4.4%,” he [Larry Summers] said. “It continues to be my view that we are unlikely to achieve inflation stability without a recession of a magnitude that would take unemployment towards the 6% range.” https://www.yahoo.com/now/larry-summers-says-u-recession-113019664.html
Editor: June Zaccone, Assoc. Prof. [Emerita] of Economics, Hofstra University.